United States · USPTO
Generate an English application draft per USPTO practice with AI, then choose: refine it yourself, firm Review & File, Full Service representation, or the Guaranteed tier with a full agency-fee refund if not granted.
From near-zero-cost AI self-drafting to end-to-end representation — pick how much you want to do yourself, upgrade anytime.
Draft it yourself with AI, at near-zero cost
Mining: 1 run on sign-up · Drafting 10 credits/run
You draft, we see it through
¥25,000
Best for: teams happy to draft with the AI tool who want professional review and full procedural handling
End-to-end representation · unlimited office action responses
¥50,000
Everything in Full Service + full agency-fee refund if not granted
¥98,000
If the application is finally not granted, the full agency service fee is refunded (official and third-party fees excluded); exact milestones and conditions per the engagement agreement
We do not promise examination outcomes — the refund is a fee arrangement, not a guarantee of grant
Service fee · reference price · official fees extra · final terms per engagement agreement
Tell us about your technology and target market; the advisor will recommend a tier and issue a formal quote.
We reply within 30 minutes during business hours. Submitted after hours? We'll reach out the next business day.
A named owner at every step, from disclosure to closure
An advisor learns your technology and market goals, confirms jurisdiction and tier, and issues a formal quote.
For the tiers where we draft: a prior-art search before filing, with qualitative first-pass signals (a reference, not an outcome prediction). If you draft it yourself, you can run mining in the self-serve tool first.
For the tiers where we draft: we draft the application with in-house review. For Review & File: we run compliance and quality review on your AI-drafted application and flag must-fix issues.
A registered practitioner of the target jurisdiction signs, files, and takes over all official correspondence.
Unlimited office action responses, followed through to grant or closure.
We do not promise examination outcomes — that honesty is itself our professionalism
Our partner firm, founded in 2009, has handled nearly 30,000 patent matters across the US, Europe, Japan, Korea and other major jurisdictions.
It depends on how much drafting you want to do. If you are happy completing the draft yourself with the AI tool and only want professional review plus procedural handling, choose Review & File. If you want us to handle everything from search to drafting to responses, choose Full Service. If you also want to shift the fee risk of a non-grant to us, choose Guaranteed. Not sure? Sign up and try the self-serve tool first, then decide.
No. Examination outcomes depend on the novelty and inventiveness of your technology and on the examiner's judgment — no firm can promise a grant, and neither do we. The Guaranteed tier is a fee arrangement: if the application is finally not granted, we refund the full agency service fee (official and third-party fees excluded), sharing your risk with real money. Exact refund milestones and conditions are set out in the engagement agreement.
Official fees are charged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) per its current public fee schedule and vary with applicant entity status and fee updates, so they are not included in the agency service fee. Before signing we provide an itemized official-fee estimate for your case — public schedules, zero markup.
Pendency is set by each patent office: US utility applications typically take 1.5–3 years, UK applications 2–4 years. After filing we track official notices and respond promptly, with transparent progress.
A US-registered patent practitioner signs, files, and handles all official correspondence — since 20 July 2026, applicants without US domicile must be represented by a US-registered practitioner. Your case is guarded by the professional team from drafting through examination responses.
Complete your English draft with this platform's AI tools: innovation mining includes a run on sign-up, drafting is 10 credits per run (new users get 25 bonus credits). We then take over: reviewing the draft, flagging must-fix issues, filing, and answering all office actions. Draft quality affects grant prospects — the review step guards it.
The fee buys end-to-end representation by practicing attorneys / registered practitioners of the target jurisdiction, fighting for a defensible patent for you. On a tighter budget, you can draft with the AI tool first (10 credits per run) and then choose the Review & File tier — an advisor can compare options for your specific technology.
No institution can promise the outcome of an individual examination — it depends on the novelty and inventiveness of the technology itself, not on who files it. What we can do is have practicing attorneys / registered practitioners of the target jurisdiction deeply involved in drafting and office-action responses, doing every controllable step well.
Innovation mining includes a run on sign-up; English application drafts are 10 credits per run. Refine the draft yourself, or upgrade to firm Review & File or Full Service anytime.
Already have a working solution? We'll help you systematically explore R&D directions you might have missed.
Drafts are grounded in real research and US drafting conventions based on USPTO/MPEP practice; unverified details are flagged for review. Output is always in English. Every draft is a first draft for a qualified US patent attorney or agent to review before filing — the self-serve tool does not file with the USPTO; for filing and examination responses, see the firm's representation services on this page.
Two kinds of service on this page
This page offers two kinds of service — ① Self-serve tools: AI-generated English drafts, to be reviewed by a qualified representative before filing. Running a tool files nothing with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and outputs are not legal advice. ② Representation: end-to-end handling and filing by a registered practitioner of the target jurisdiction; scope, fees and refund terms are governed by the engagement agreement. Service fees shown are reference prices; official fees are extra.
Get this report, together with a note on what still needs human verification.
Patent rights go to whoever files first, and the UK requires absolute novelty — show it at a trade fair or put it on your website before filing and you usually cannot file any more.